Day 2 Notes
Why consider a relation between art and machine learning? Or, a broader question: Why consider a relation between art and technology? Are all tools open to creative use (see friedrich kittler “There Is No Software”)? How to affectively employ creativity while both production and consumption of creative work change from artisanal (hands-on, direct) to industrialized (mediated, distributed)? (see Gilbert Simondon “Technical Mentality”?
A few examples from art history:
process / materials, pedagogy / practice
strategies against identification / interpretation
framing, explanation
poetics effects produced by creative work - not so much the meaning, or the mechanism, the possibility of reading, of many meanings and many mechanisms connections
error failure mistake interruption
joan jonas - organic honey’s vertical roll
nancy holt - boomerang
yasunao tone - solo for wounded cd
helio oiticica
archives taxonomies connectionism templates organize classify cluster
- pierre schaefer - etudes des bruits (1948)
- aby warburg “mnemosyne atlas”
- eleanor antin
- hanne darboven
- lee lozano
- laura poitras “astro noise”
simulation (over and about time) continuance emergence / aleatory scale / duration generative
amanda ross-ho
google arts and culture
- https://artsexperiments.withgoogle.com
- https://www.google.com/culturalinstitute/
- https://magenta.tensorflow.org/